This piece of work sucks. I couldn't see anything at all. This is worse than that 'world's smallest pixel painting' thingy someone pulled off a while back that was simply a lone black pixel...
...What?
Seriously though, while I don't comment much myself, I always read the author's comments, and quite often - although not always, depending on length and average quality - also the comments of other viewers anyway, whether I intend to comment or not.
Mostly when I notice the description is full of typos and other horrid errors, as well as all capitalization, web-speak, or capitalization of every other letter, or perhaps as soon as I open the piece and see that it is basically a poem and it isn't put under that category or if it is a ripped off song and, by quick perusal, don't see a disclaimer for said song anywhere. Mostly, I just a short, terse, but overall polite warning, more like a "hey, heads up - this isn't a chapter/this isn't your work/not everybody will be happy to see that this is a poem when you made it sound like a story."
Wait - hold up... I've never done it one DA - normally if I'm not interested enough to look at the picture I won't comment - I'll just hit the x button. However, if for some reason I can't even get a partial view of the piece, I'll let the person know.
Actually, no. Though, a couple times, I have forgotten portions of it before commenting (I typically have 20-30 tabs open, I can't remember everything...). Of course, those are the critical portions.
Why do you ask? Is it because of your latest widescreen pic where you said that you were aware of the lens flare but it didn't bother you, and then people still commented on it?
Sta.sh
Devious Comments
...What?
Seriously though, while I don't comment much myself, I always read the author's comments, and quite often - although not always, depending on length and average quality - also the comments of other viewers anyway, whether I intend to comment or not.
Doubly so when I do intend to comment, of course.