Shop More Submit  Join Login

Given that each new mouth to feed puts a drain on much needed, and fast disappearing natural resources, how many kids is enough? 

57%
95 deviants said 2
21%
36 deviants said 1
12%
20 deviants said 3
5%
8 deviants said 4
4%
7 deviants said 8+
1%
1 deviant said 5
1%
1 deviant said 6
0%
No deviants said 7

Devious Comments

:iconaseamlessbonds:
Aseamlessbonds Featured By Owner May 20, 2012  Student General Artist
I think that 2 is a good number, one for each parent, then the worlds population may drop to a reasonable balance. It would be a lot cheaper for the parents too! :lol:
Reply
:iconrobby-robert:
Robby-Robert Featured By Owner May 15, 2012
Yeah, I would have voted 0.
I also follow my own advice, no more mini me's!
Reply
:iconumbreon17:
umbreon17 Featured By Owner May 15, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
you forgot 0. i voted 1 instead :p
Reply
:iconkadaeux:
kadaeux Featured By Owner May 14, 2012
I voted for 8+

The faster we go through Earth's own resource the faster those penny pinching oxygen theives in governments and corporations the world over will invest in getting us off this putrid pebble in space. :p
Reply
:iconjthomastheartist13:
JThomastheartist13 Featured By Owner May 14, 2012
everyone should get a credit. one to replace yourself. you dont want kids then the credit goes up for lottery for those that want more
Reply
:iconalohasoy:
Alohasoy Featured By Owner May 14, 2012
I voted for 1, but if there was a 0 option I would put that. Voluntary Human Extinction ftw!
Reply
:iconpriteeboy:
priteeboy Featured By Owner May 14, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I wish I had a dollar for every time I rambled on about a much needed global population control, especially if some third-world countries with massive populations (like India and China) ever reach a first world status and everyone there is going to want their own house and car :faint:

2 is enough...globally. 2 in theory is enough to replace each parent when they die, so things stay balanced, especially the ratio of young people to old people :p
Reply
:iconartbyjeremykerr:
ArtByJeremyKerr Featured By Owner May 14, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I voted for 2 as well. Being that I have 2 right now and they are plenty enough to handle. :)
Reply
:iconfractalxavier91:
fractalxavier91 Featured By Owner May 14, 2012
Two kids. A kid's gotta have someone to confide in, and that isn't always the parent. There's just some things kids don't want to tell their parents, but would willingly tell their sibling (I'm talking from experience). It might also make them less selfish if they have to share their parents' attention between the two of them.
Reply
:icontjsgrimm:
TJSGrimm Featured By Owner May 14, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
1 ideally (for me) because there are already so many people, there's always adoption if you want more ._. I can see why someone would want more of their own, though :\
I say if you have the money to have tons of kids, then go for it. It's too much when you have 3-5 and you can barely put food on the table. Clothes, food, living expenses and schooling is expensive, especially since a lot of parents aren't able (and unfortunately, there are some that are unwilling) to seek better paying jobs.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 

Poll History